On his blog, Nicholas Stix recently reposted his 2003 article
NBC’s Law & Order: Anti-White Propaganda in the Culture War in which he documented how
Law & Order writers routinely take high-profile crimes committed by blacks and replace the bad guys with whites.
Although the article only covered episodes through 2003, I can verify the practice of switching the race of characters to show blacks in the most favorable light and whites in the least favorable light continues. When the
Law & Order: Criminal Intent series based an epsiode on the Duke Lacrosse rape case in 2007, they pulled a double-switcheroo: the false accuser wasn't black, but the sympathetic athlete falsely accused of rape was.
Up until this weekend, this was the only episode of the
Law & Order franchise I'd actually watched. I was bedridden with a stomach bug on Friday and Saturday, and I had the television on almost nonstop. While I was watching various movies and sports games, I would flip to episodes of
Law & Order and
Law & Order: Special Victims Unit during the ads, and I was able to piece together the plots of several episodes.
I was able to confirm for myself that not only does the
Law & Order franchise over-represent white people as criminals, but it actively conditions white people to not think of blacks as criminals.
In several episodes the initial suspect was a black male, but the real perpetrator turned out to be a white male.
In an episode of
Law & Order: SVU, a white girl was found mauled by a tiger and shot to death. The previous day, she had hung out with a black rapper who owned a tiger. Was the black rapper guilty? No, of course not. Turns out it was a different tiger that mauled her. With the black rapper cleared of wrongdoing, the new suspects were two animal smugglers, one white and one black. But at the very end of the episode, it was revealed that the black smuggler was actually an undercover officer. The white smuggler was the lone murderer.
In an episode of
Law & Order, a white woman was found shot to death inside a car a black thug broke into. Did the black thug shoot her? No, of course not. The woman’s white husband did.
Assuming the episodes I viewed were a random sample, non-white perpetrators aren't as rare as I thought they were. In three of the episodes I viewed, the perpetrator was black. But in all three episodes, the crime was shown to be a justified reaction to white racism or oppression, and the black perpetrator was portrayed sympathetically.
In an episode of
Law & Order: SVU, a black transsexual woman tried to murder a white man who was opposed to letting his 13-year-old son begin "transitioning" into a woman. The black "woman" was portrayed as the real victim. By the end of the episode, the white father not only decided to let his son begin taking female hormones, but he came to the conclusion that the black transsexual had been justified in trying to kill him (since he was killing his son's soul). The father petitioned to have the attempted murder charges dropped, and the detectives agreed this was the proper thing to do.
In another
SVU episode, an African war criminal held children hostage in a church after his bid for asylum was denied. The criminal was portrayed as a victim, and his actions were presented as a combined result of an uncompassionate immigration system and "stereotype threat".
And in an episode of
Law & Order, a gang of black Harlem thugs murdered a white man they mistook for a police informant. The murder was portrayed as a justified reaction to recent incidents of police brutality, and the attackers got a slap on the wrist.
What did I take away from all this? Athena Kerry was correct when she wrote on the VDARE Blog that perpetrators on
Law & Order are overwhelmingly white, and the occasional non-white perpetrator gets a "
pity party." And Nicholas Stix was correct when he wrote that
Law & Order writers seek "to cause whites to hate other whites, while being more sympathetic towards blacks."