Friday, June 26, 2009

Attorney General Holder: Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws

On the night of June 1, 2008, a mob of nearly two dozen black teenagers stormed through the streets of Mount Clemens, Michigan, robbing and beating any white person who crossed their path (see article here).

One white man was talking on a payphone outside a gas station when he was accosted by the mob. He tried to run into the gas station to safety, but the attendant had already locked the door when he saw the mob approaching. As the man desperately pounded on the locked door, he was surrounded by the mob and savagely beaten. Workers would later have to wash the victim's blood from the front of the door.

In an even more violent incident, a car driven by Andy Kaufmann, a 29-year-old white father of three, was surrounded and a brick was thrown through the window. Andy was beaten unconscious and left with a fractured skull. He sustained permanent brain damage and will never be the same. Andy's wife Angelina, who was sitting in the passenger seat on the night of the attack and who watched helplessly as her husband was nearly killed, laments, “I miss the Andy I used to know."

In light of the brutality of the crimes committed that night, the sentences handed down were extremely lenient. The man who threw the brick at Kaufmann's car and instigated the attack, 17-year-old Deonte J. Williams, was sentenced to only 19 months in prison.

In a radio interview shortly after the attack, Macomb County Sheriff Mark Hackel was asked why hate crime charges were not sought, which would have resulted in stiffer penalties. Hackel responded that he didn't consider hate crime laws to be applicable since Kaufmann is white, and therefore not a member of a "protected class." Hackel said, "I don’t know if it [hate-crime legislation] applies to an unprotected class, and I don’t know if whites are part of that. I’m not sure.”

In hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday, Attorney General Eric Holder settled Hackel's question of whether hate crime laws protect whites: they don't.

Holder repeatedly claimed that hate crime laws are designed to protect only groups that were targeted for violence on a "historic basis," such as African-Americans, Hispanics, Jews, and gays. (Holder's testimony can be viewed in its entirety by clicking the 'webcast' link here. He lists the groups he considers to be protected between 73:30 and 74 minutes).

Holder's repeated charge that blacks were "historically" targeted for violence betrays the fact that in modern times they rarely are. In fact, according to the Justice Department's own statistics, in only 10% of the 650,000 violent interracial crimes that occur each year in this country are white offenders attacking black victims.

(The Justice Department statistics can be found in the second to last paragraph of the article "What is a hate crime?" which appeared in the Chicago Tribune. For a more detailed study of race, crime, and justice in America, see the publication The Color of Crime, which is released by the New Century Foundation.)

In 90% of interracial violent crimes, whites are being attacked by blacks. Attacks on white individuals and couples by mobs of black youths are all too common in this country. On this blog, I've recently written about recurring black-on-white mob attacks taking place in Philadelphia and Baltimore.

If any racial group is being targeted for violence in this country, it's whites, by blacks. If any group is deserving of special protection from racially motivated violence, it's whites.


Attorney General Eric Holder testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, June 25. Holder said that hate crime laws are designed to protect only groups such that have been targeted on a "historical basis" such as African-Americans, Hispanics, Jews, and gays.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Last week a gang of home invaders were sentenced in Riverhead, NY, for burglary and hammer attack on a white woman, whose apartment they broke into.
The women was asleep when they broke in. Not content to just steal from her, one of them woke her up and started hammering her face. She needed over 80 stitches and her adult children have to now care for her. Why would anyone do that unless they are motivated by hate? The story has stuck with me because it's so violent:
http://www.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/suffolk-serial-home-invasion-burglars-sentenced/
and
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/suffolk/ny-liburg1912893668jun18,0,13908.story

I can only imagine the laughter they must have shared after attacking the "white bitch".

This story was never covered when it happened, and photos of the attackers were omitted from the main newspaper article.

Anonymous said...

How does Sheriff Mack determine who is what race? Do authorities have have a racial identification book or something to judge by?

Anonymous said...

http://muffledoar.blogspot.com/2009/06/holder-whites-will-not-be-protected-by.html
Holder testimoney indexed.

Anonymous said...

This is the reason why I keep a loaded gun handly. After two blacks attacked me in my dorm room, I decided the next time they do that I will kill them.

Anonymous said...

By claiming that 90% of crimes against whites are perpetrated by minorities, you are calling for stiffer penalties because of race differences. In fact, you don't care about the issue of racism, you are just seeking to have higher penalties for blacks.

meuse said...

The stats are what they are: "In 2005, there were more than 645,000 victims of cross-racial violent crimes between blacks and whites in the U.S. In 90 percent of those crimes, black offenders attacked white victims."
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-070610hatecrime-story,0,7700301.story

Anonymous said...

To Mr/Ms Anonymous who claims that the writer only wants stiffer penalties for blacks: The 90% is correct if you get your head out of he sand. The current administration is more racist than any in our history

Anonymous said...

I grew up in a racially divided country, South Africa. It was divided for very good reason. Blacks and whites will never live in harmony for one reason, and one reason only. We are different. Different cultures, different values etc. The difference in skin color is the least of the differences. Why are we so afraid to recognize this fact?

Anonymous said...

Well said. Why can't we just admit that we are different and let it go.
I honestly don't see what was so wrong with segregation, its pretty much what goes on in our personal lives now anyway.

flagrantviolator said...

In the past 3 years in my community, there have been upwards of 300 swarmings of whites by blacks, mostly on the transit sysyem. One "whiteboy" was stabbed to death because he refused to give up his IPOD. Stabbings are rampant. The newspapers, of course, rarely comment on the race of armed robbers unless they are white. It is common knowledge that it is Somalians who carry out over 95 % of all swarming/gang robberies, yet no one is brave enough to say anything in any official capacity. The police only see fit to organise a "Somali Youth Basketball League" (advertising it as "open to all races...), rather than deal with the problem. Police and politicians are cowards, whites need to deal with this problem ourselves. Arm the masses!

Post a Comment